Skip to main content

Table 4 Models of diagnosis: a overall cost b and numbers of investigations for screening 1,000 adult men or women in the community for CD

From: A novel serogenetic approach determines the community prevalence of celiac disease and informs improved diagnostic pathways

Screen

Sex

Model

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

TG2 IgAc

F

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

–

–

–

–

M

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

–

–

–

–

Composite TG2/DGP IgA/IgGc

F

–

–

–

–

–

1,000

1,000

1,000

M

–

–

–

–

–

1,000

1,000

1,000

HLA-DQd

F

–

–

–

–

1,000

–

–

–

M

–

–

–

–

1,000

–

–

–

Confirmatory test if initial test is ‘positive’

 TG2 IgAc

F

–

–

–

–

560

–

–

–

M

–

–

–

–

557

–

–

–

 EMAc

F

–

–

45

3

19

–

–

–

M

–

–

69

2

37

–

–

–

 TG2 IgA and DGP-G, DGP-Ae

F

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

52

M

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

79

 HLA-DQd

F

–

45

45

3

–

–

52

52

M

–

69

69

2

–

–

79

79

Biopsy if initial and/or confirmatory tests are positivef

 Biopsy

F

45

32

32

42

18

52

38

28

M

69

45

45

67

16

79

48

24

 Cases diagnosedg

F

13

13

13

13

13

19

19

19

M

13

13

13

13

13

12

12

12

 Total cost for investigations, A$

F

63,150

57,484

58,605

61,034

149,367

69,100

63,422

57,010

M

83,550

71,406

73,124

82,139

148,041

92,050

75,152

57,924

 Cost per case screened, A$

F

63

57

59

61

149

69

63

57

M

84

71

73

82

148

92

75

58

 Cost per case diagnosed, A$

F

4,858

4,422

4,508

4,695

11,490

3,637

3,338

3,001

 

M

6,427

5,493

5,625

6,318

11,388

7,671

6,263

4,827

  1. Abbreviations: CD, celiac disease; DGP, Deamidated gliadin-derived peptide; EMA, endomysial antibody; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; TG, transglutaminase.
  2. aData are n, unless otherwise stated.
  3. bCosts are based on 100% reimbursement of Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule fee for items c71163: A$24.90, d71151: A$119.65, e71164: A$40.15, and fA$850 estimated costs of gastroscopy, histology, sedation, and hospital/clinic facility fee.
  4. gCases diagnosed were assumed to be the excess of HLA-DQ2.5/8/2.2 subjects in those screened by TG2 IgA (models A to E), or composite antigen ELISA (model F to H), as detailed in Table 1.