Skip to main content

Table 2 Population-based sex and rural/urban prevalence of HIV in Guntur district

From: A population-based study of human immunodeficiency virus in south India reveals major differences from sentinel surveillance-based estimates

 

Men

Women

Total

 

Participants (n)

HIV-positive (n)

Adjusted HIV prevalence* (%)

95% CI (design effect)

Participants (n)

HIV-positive (n)

Adjusted HIV prevalence* (%)

95% CI (design effect)

Adjusted HIV prevalence* (%)

95% CI (design effect)

Rural

3139

54

1.57

0.86–2.28 (2.36)

3178

50

1.71

1.18–2.24 (1.43)

1.64

1.10–2.18 (2.86)

   Western region (Durgi)

733

6

0.81

 

763

7

0.97

 

0.89

0.06–1.72 (3.02)

   Central region†

1527

38

2.58

 

1543

26

1.79

 

2.19

1.41–2.97 (2.30)

(Mupalla)

757

21

2.73

 

776

15

2.03

 

2.39

1.19–3.59 (2.47)

(Narsaraopet)

770

17

2.43

 

767

11

1.54

 

1.99

0.92–3.06 (2.36)

   Eastern region (Kollur)

879

10

1.23

 

872

17

1.94

 

1.58

0.45–2.71 (3.75)

Urban

3096

76

2.11

1.50–2.72 (1.37)

3204

61

1.67

1.22–2.12 (1.04)

1.89

1.39–2.39 (2.13)

   Guntur

2358

61

2.45

 

2443

44

1.63

 

2.04

1.44–2.64 (2.29)

   Narsaraopet

738

15

1.91

 

761

17

1.83

 

1.87

0.95–2.79 (1.84)

Total

6235

130

1.74

1.27–2.21 (1.80)

6382

111

1.70

1.36–2.04 (1.21)

1.72

1.35–2.09 (2.44)

  1. *Adjustments explained in the methods section.
  2. †Central region rural population was represented by Mupalla and Narsaraopet mandals as explained in the methods section.
  3. CI, confidence interval.