Table 4 Cross-jurisdictional comparison of percentage of clients rated as better off elsewhere by MAPLe priority level
MAPLe | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | Low | Mild | Moderate | High | Very high |
Derivation sample | |||||
Ontario | 6.4 | 9.1 | 10.2 | 18.9 | 33.1 |
Validation samples | |||||
Italy | 4.7 | 11.8 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 19.0 |
Michigan | 4.2 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 7.9 | 13.8 |
Iceland | 10.3 | 26.3 | 22.3 | 29.4 | 50.0 |
Sweden | 3.5 | 9.1 | 4.8 | 11.5 | 10.0 |
British Columbia | 10.8 | 14.1 | 18.7 | 33.8 | 47.7 |
WRHA, Manitoba | 5.1 | 8.4 | 10.8 | 16.9 | 23.5 |
Ontario (8 CCAC) | 6.3 | 9.2 | 13.6 | 25.0 | 43.0 |
Nova Scotia | 4.8 | 11.1 | 28.1 | 54.6 | 84.2 |
Japan | 14.6 | 5.4 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 10.9 |
Georgia | 3.0 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 7.3 |