Skip to main content

Table 22 Kidney cancer; meta-analysis results

From: Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer in Europe and North America

    

Heterogeneity

Type of ST (region)a

Adjustments/restrictionsb

Number of estimates (RR/OR ids)c

Random-effects RR/OR (95% CI)

χ2

I2

P(χ2)

Any

Overall data

11 (3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19)

1.23 (0.86–1.76)d

16.5

39.2

0.087

 

Smoking-adjusted

5 (3, 5, 13, 17, 19)

1.09 (0.69–1.71)e

6.9

41.9

0.142

 

Never smokers

2 (5, 17)

2.19 (0.63–7.70)

2.5

59.6

0.116

Any (USA)

Overall data

8 (4, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19)

1.52 (0.94–2.46)

11.1

37.1

0.133

 

Smoking-adjusted

3 (5, 13, 19)

1.41 (0.64–3.10)

4.2

51.8

0.125

 

Never smokers

1 (5)

4.80 (1.18–19.56)

--

--

--

Snuff (Scandinavia)f

Overall data

1 (3)

0.72 (0.44–1.18)

--

--

--

 

Smoking-adjusted

1 (3)

0.72 (0.44–1.18)

--

--

--

  1. a For each study/sex, the RR/OR for ST from Table 21 was included if available, otherwise that for chewing tobacco or snuff was used.
  2. b Smoking-adjusted includes estimates for smokers and non-smokers combined, adjusted for smoking if available, and estimates for never smokers otherwise.
  3. c The actual estimates included are identified by their RR/OR identification numbers as given in Table 21.
  4. d Test for publication bias 0.05 ≤ P < 0.1.
  5. e Test for publication bias 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05.
  6. f There are no available data for never smokers using snuff in Scandinavia.
  7. CI = confidence interval; ST = smokeless tobacco; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk.