Peer Review reports
From: Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ludovic Trinquart |
28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Thompson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
25 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tianjing Li |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ludovic Trinquart |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tianjing Li |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tianjing Li |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
27 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-79 |
You can find further information about peer review here.