Skip to main content

Table 2 Adverse outcomes at 12 months follow-up

From: Predictive validity of a two-step tool to map frailty in primary care

Adverse outcome

Not frail

Frail

Absolute difference in outcome proportion

P value for difference

(n = 325)

(n = 195)

(95 % confidence interval)

Composite of negative health outcomesa, n (%)

30 (9.2)

59 (30.3)

21.0 (13.9–28.2)

<0.001

ADL decline, n (%)

23 (7.2)

37 (21.0)

13.8 (7.2–20.5)

<0.001

Institutionalisation, n (%)

4 (1.2)

10 (5.1)

3.9 (0.6–7.2)

0.02

Died, n (%)

2 (0.6)

12 (6.2)

5.5 (2.1–9.0)

0.002

Too ill to be assessed at follow up with EASY-Care TOS, n (%)

1 (0.3)

4 (2.1)

1.7 (−0.3–3.8)

0.10

Hospital admission, n (%)

41 (12.9)

39 (22.0)

9.1 (2.0–16.2)

0.01

Use of out of hours visits GP, n (%)

24 (7.7)

30 (17.3)

9.6 (3.3–16.0)

0.003

Increase in hours home care, n (%)

32 (11.1)

46 (28.8)

17.7 (9.5–25.9)

<0.001

  1. Differences in the between the frail and not frail participants, as assessed by EASY-Care TOS judgement (n = 520)
  2. ADL activities of daily living, EASY-Care TOS EASY-Care Two step Older people Screening, GP general practitioner
  3. aComposite of negative health outcomes is defined as the occurrence of ADL decline, institutionalisation, too ill to be assessed at follow up with EASY-Care TOS, or death during 12 months follow up