Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Oct 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Nov 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-016-0736-x |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
