Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Medicine

Fig. 1

From: Performance of InSilicoVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards

Fig. 1

Comparison of InSilicoVA and Tariff 2.0 at the individual and population levels. Note: Individual-level accuracy is assessed using chance-corrected concordance. Population-level accuracy is assessed using chance-corrected cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy. Values of zero in either dimension are equivalent to random guessing and range up to 100% for perfect accuracy. InSilicoVA is tested using the default expert-derived probbase, a probbase empirically trained using InterVA symptoms, and a probbase empirically trained using Tariff 2.0 symptoms. Published accuracies of Tariff 2.0 are shown for comparison

Back to article page

BMC Medicine

ISSN: 1741-7015

Contact us