Skip to main content

Table 4 Post hoc subgroup analysis: analysis of adjusted differences in mean HbA1c at 12 months by self-reported oral hypoglycaemic use shown as effect size and 95% confidence interval

From: Effects of the Norfolk diabetes prevention lifestyle intervention (NDPS) on glycaemic control in screen-detected type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial

Analysis

INT-DPM vs INT

p

INT vs CONTROL

p

INT-DPM vs CONTROL

p

Combined INT vs CONTROL

p

Oral hypoglycaemic use

−2.8 (−7.2, 1.49)

0.19

−4.2 (−9.3, 0.77)

0.09

−7.0 (−11.5, −2.5)

0.003

−5.45 (−9.3, −1.6)

0.006

No oral hypoglycaemic use

−0.79 (−1.12, 2.69)

0.41

−0.93 (−2.46, 0.59)

0.23

− 0.68 (2.27, 0.92)

0.40

− 0.7 (−2.92, 0.72)

0.33

  1. Adjusted for baseline Hba1c data