Skip to main content

Table 3 Statistically significant results of network meta-analysis in randomized controlled trials

From: Comparative safety and effectiveness of serotonin receptor antagonists in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Treatment comparison

Number of studies

NMA estimate OR (95% CI)a

MA estimate OR (95% CI)

Arrhythmia – 3 RCTs, 4 (inconsistency not applicableb)

 No statistically significant results

Mortality – 8 RCTs, 7 treatments, 4823 adults

 No statistically significant results

Evaluation of inconsistency using the design-by-treatment interaction model

Chi-squared test: 1.06

P-value: 0.79

Degrees of freedom: 3

Heterogeneity: 0.00

QTc prolongation – 4 RCTs, 7 treatments, 3358 children and adults (inconsistency not applicableb)

 Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs dolasetron + dexamethasone

1

0.34 (0.24–0.47)

0.34 (0.24–0.47)

Number of patients without nausea – 44 RCTS, 12 treatments plus placebo, 11,664 adults

 Ondansetron + steroid vs ondansetron

8

1.96 (1.59–2.41)

2.16 (1.45–3.23)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs granisetron

1

2.00 (1.63–2.45)

21.00 (3.35–131.51)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs dolasetron

NA

2.09 (1.47–2.97)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs dolasetron + steroid

NA

0.44 (0.20–0.96)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs palonosetron

NA

1.60 (1.06–2.41)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs tropisetron + steroid

1

2.40 (1.49–3.88)

7.20 (2.03–25.51)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

337.68 (18.89–6035.72)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs ondansetron

NA

1.91 (1.55–2.34)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs granisetron

6

1.95 (1.62–2.34)

1.96 (1.54–2.50)

 Granisetron + steroid vs dolasetron

NA

2.04 (1.44–2.87)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs dolasetron + steroid

NA

0.43 (0.20–0.93)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs palonosetron

NA

1.55 (1.04–2.33)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs tropisetron + steroid

1

2.34 (1.45–3.77)

7.20 (1.29–40.05)

 Granisetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

328.52 (18.40–5864.44)

NA

 Ondansetron vs dolasetron + steroid

NA

0.22 (0.10–0.48)

NA

 Ondansetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.53 (0.39–0.73)

NA

 Ondansetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.29 (0.13–0.62)

NA

 Ondansetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.35 (0.19–0.64)

NA

 Ondansetron vs placebo

NA

172.34 (9.67–3070.30)

NA

 Granisetron vs dolasetron + steroid

NA

0.22 (0.10–0.47)

NA

 Granisetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.52 (0.39–0.70)

NA

 Granisetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.28 (0.13–0.61)

NA

 Granisetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.34 (0.19–0.62)

NA

 Granisetron vs placebo

1

168.85 (9.51–2996.71)

169.00 (9.52–2999.80)

 Dolasetron vs dolasetron + steroid

1

0.21 (0.10–0.42)

0.21 (0.10–0.42)

 Dolasetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.50 (0.33–0.76)

NA

 Dolasetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.27 (0.12–0.61)

NA

 Dolasetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.33 (0.17–0.63)

NA

 Dolasetron vs placebo

NA

161.31 (8.95–2907.94)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs palonosetron

NA

3.65 (1.68–7.94)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

2.39 (1.06–5.39)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

5.49 (2.27–13.27)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

3.19 (1.29–7.85)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

771.35 (39.35–15,120.97)

NA

 Palonosetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.35 (0.15–0.83)

NA

 Palonosetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.43 (0.22–0.86)

NA

 Palonosetron vs placebo

NA

211.46 (11.64–3841.31)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

2.30 (1.35–3.91)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

323.08 (17.93–5821.31)

NA

 Tropisetron + steroid vs tropisetron + steroid

2

0.24 (0.13–0.44)

0.24 (0.13–0.44)

 Tropisetron + steroid vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.29 (0.14–0.60)

NA

 Tropisetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

140.45 (7.63–2585.40)

NA

 Tropisetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

597.18 (30.37–11,744.01)

NA

 Ramosetron + steroid vs ramosetron + steroid

1

0.49 (0.31–0.78)

0.48 (0.29–0.79)

 Ramosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

242.02 (13.10–4471.01)

NA

 Ramosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

490.92 (26.08–9241.08)

NA

Evaluation of inconsistency using the design-by-treatment interaction model

Chi-squared test: 15.91

P-value: 0.1955

Degrees of freedom: 12

Heterogeneity: 0.00

Number of patients without vomiting – 63 RCTs, 12 treatments plus placebo, 15,460 adults

 Ondansetron + steroid vs ondansetron

9

2.46 (1.80–3.37)

2.47 (1.52–4.03)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs granisetron

1

2.35 (1.70–3.25)

21.00 (3.35–131.51)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs dolasetron

NA

2.83 (1.78–4.51)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs tropisetron

1

2.95 (1.76–4.94)

7.20 (2.03–25.51)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

31.56 (11.42–87.23)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs ondansetron

NA

2.31 (1.66–3.21)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs granisetron

8

2.21 (1.64–2.96)

2.40 (1.21–4.75)

 Granisetron + steroid vs dolasetron

NA

2.66 (1.66–4.27)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs tropisetron

1

2.77 (1.65–4.66)

34.52 (1.83–650.54)

 Granisetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

29.64 (10.74–81.82)

NA

 Ondansetron vs dolasetron + steroid

NA

0.46 (0.24–0.89)

NA

 Ondansetron vs palonosetron

2

0.59 (0.39–0.89)

0.44 (0.27–0.73)

 Ondansetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.33 (0.18–0.59)

NA

 Ondansetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.32 (0.12–0.85)

NA

 Ondansetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.37 (0.17–0.83)

NA

 Ondansetron vs placebo

3

12.82 (4.85–33.94)

11.02 (3.30–36.84)

 Granisetron vs dolasetron + steroid

NA

0.48 (0.25–0.94)

NA

 Granisetron vs palonosetron

3

0.62 (0.42–0.92)

0.69 (0.48–0.98)

 Granisetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.35 (0.20–0.62)

NA

 Granisetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.34 (0.13–0.90)

NA

 Granisetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.39 (0.18–0.87)

NA

 Granisetron vs placebo

1

13.44 (5.02–35.96)

78.00 (6.24–974.67)

 Dolasetron vs dolasetron + steroid

1

0.40 (0.20–0.80)

0.21 (0.09–0.50)

 Dolasetron vs palonosetron

1

0.51 (0.32–0.83)

0.55 (0.36–0.85)

 Dolasetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.29 (0.15–0.57)

NA

 Dolasetron vs tropisetron + steroid

NA

0.28 (0.10–0.79)

NA

 Dolasetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.32 (0.14–0.78)

NA

 Dolasetron vs placebo

NA

11.14 (3.94–31.49)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs tropisetron

NA

2.61 (1.20–5.69)

NA

 Dolasetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

27.92 (8.62–90.43)

NA

 Palonosetron vs tropisetron

NA

2.02 (1.13–3.63)

NA

 Palonosetron vs placebo

NA

21.65 (7.60–61.72)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs tropisetron

NA

3.62 (1.78–7.37)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs ramosetron

NA

2.24 (1.02–4.91)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

38.78 (12.56–119.76)

NA

 Tropisetron vs tropisetron + steroid

2

0.27 (0.11–0.64)

0.27 (0.13–0.57)

 Tropisetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.31 (0.13–0.77)

NA

 Tropisetron vs placebo

NA

10.70 (3.69–31.01)

NA

 Tropisetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

39.86 (10.09–157.37)

NA

 Ramosetron vs placebo

1

17.30 (6.20–48.30)

10.45 (2.21–49.38)

 Ramosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

34.31 (10.33–113.92)

NA

Evaluation of inconsistency using the design-by-treatment interaction model

Chi-squared test: 22.14

P-value: 0.1387

Degrees of freedom: 16

Heterogeneity: 0.10

Number of patients without CINV – 27 RCTs, 10 treatments, 10,924 adults

 Ondansetron + steroid vs ondansetron

1

2.16 (1.62–2.87)

1.96 (1.12–3.42)

 Ondansetron + steroid vs granisetron

NA

2.17 (1.73–2.72)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.81 (0.67–0.98)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs tropisetron

NA

4.18 (1.99–8.77)

NA

 Ondansetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

365.96 (20.44–6553.02)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs ondansetron

NA

2.23 (1.69–2.93)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs granisetron

6

2.24 (1.83–2.74)

2.35 (1.88–2.94)

 Granisetron + steroid vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.84 (0.70–0.99)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs tropisetron

NA

4.31 (2.07–9.01)

NA

 Granisetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

378.03 (21.15–6756.45)

NA

 Ondansetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.38 (0.27–0.52)

NA

 Ondansetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.31 (0.16–0.59)

NA

 Ondansetron vs placebo

NA

169.61 (9.48–3035.34)

NA

 Granisetron vs palonosetron + steroid

NA

0.37 (0.29–0.49)

NA

 Granisetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.31 (0.16–0.60)

NA

 Granisetron vs placebo

1

168.85 (9.51–2996.64)

169.00 (9.52–2999.80)

 Palonosetron vs placebo

NA

165.47 (6.55–4182.08)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs tropisetron

NA

5.16 (2.43–10.97)

NA

 Palonosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

452.19 (25.18–8121.41)

NA

 Tropisetron vs ramosetron

NA

0.35 (0.14–0.83)

NA

 Tropisetron vs ramosetron + steroid

NA

0.16 (0.06–0.42)

NA

 Tropisetron vs placebo

NA

87.64 (4.53–1696.76)

NA

 Ramosetron vs ramosetron + steroid

1

0.46 (0.29–0.73)

0.55 (0.34–0.89)

 Ramosetron vs placebo

NA

253.30 (13.55–4734.53)

NA

 Ramosetron + steroid vs placebo

NA

546.71 (28.58–10,456.90)

NA

Evaluation of inconsistency using the design-by-treatment interaction model

Chi-squared test: 11.95

P-value: 0.0631

Degrees of freedom: 6

Heterogeneity: 0.00

Number of patients experiencing severe vomiting – 10 RCTs, 5 treatments, 917 adults

 Ondansetron vs granisetron

4

0.65 (0.45–0.94)

0.63 (0.43–0.93)

 Ondansetron vs placebo

3

0.16 (0.04–0.70)

0.16 (0.04–0.70)

 Ramosetron vs placebo

NA

0.18 (0.03–0.95)

NA

Evaluation of inconsistency using the design-by-treatment interaction model

Chi-squared test: 0.33

P-value: 0.5628

Degrees of freedom: 1

Heterogeneity: 0.00

  1. CI confidence interval, CINV chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, MA meta-analysis, NA not applicable, NMA network meta-analysis, OR odds ratio, RCT randomized controlled trial
  2. a Meta-analysis was not conducted for treatment comparisons where only one trial was included; in that situation, the direct estimate was obtained from the single trial
  3. b Number of interventions included in NMA is greater than number of RCTs