Skip to main content

Table 1 Definition of the different methodological choices and number of possible analytical scenarios

From: Vibration of effects from diverse inclusion/exclusion criteria and analytical choices: 9216 different ways to perform an indirect comparison meta-analysis

Category

Criteria

Number of possibilities

Medical condition

Inclusion of all studies (AUDs and/or AD)

Exclusion of studies including patients with AUDs

2

Abstinence

Inclusion of all studies (abstinent or non-abstinent patients)

Exclusion of studies requiring a minimum period of abstinence of 5 days or more before the beginning of the study

2

Gender

Inclusion of all studies (mixed gender, males only or females only)

Exclusion of studies with males or females only

2

Somatic comorbidity

Inclusion of all studies (patients with or without systematic somatic comorbidities)

Exclusion of studies on patients with systematic somatic comorbidities (e.g. studies on patients with HIV)

2

Psychiatric comorbidity

Inclusion of all studies (patients with or without systematic psychiatric comorbidities)

Exclusion of studies on patients with systematic psychiatric comorbidities (e.g. studies on depressed patients)

2

Psychological support

Inclusion of all studies (with or without psychological intervention)

Exclusion of studies with no psychological intervention

2

Treatment and dose

Only approved dose and route of administration

Approved dose and route of administration OR closest dose to the approved dose

Maximum dose tested

3

Treatment duration

Inclusion of all studies, regardless of treatment duration

Exclusion of studies with a treatment duration of less than 12 weeks

2

Outcome

Quantity of alcohol consumed*

Frequency of drinking**

Abstinence***

3

Publication

Published and unpublished studies (e.g. study reports, ClinicalTrials.gov)

Exclusion of unpublished studies

2

Risk of bias

Inclusion of all studies, regardless of the risk of selective outcome reporting

Exclusion of studies with a high risk of selective outcome reporting

2

Analysis

Fixed effect model

Random effect model

2

Total of possible combinations

9216

  1. The choice of the 5-day cut-off was based on our previous meta-analysis [25]
  2. If there were several outcomes for quantity consumed, frequency of drinking, or abstinence reported in the same study, only one criterion of each type was collected
  3. *Outcomes for the quantity of alcohol consumed were extracted in this order of preference: (1) total alcohol consumption, (2) number of drinks per day, (3) number of drinks per drinking day, and (4) alcohol consumption per drinking day
  4. **Frequency of drinking outcomes was extracted in this order of preference: (1) number of heavy drinking days, (2) percentage of heavy drinking days, and (3) percentage of drinking days
  5. ***Abstinence outcomes were extracted in this order of preference: (1) number of abstinent days, (2) percentage of abstinent days, (3) percentage of abstinent subjects, and (4) percentage of relapsing subjects