Skip to main content

Table 1 Key characteristics of included studies

From: Self-collection of samples for group B streptococcus testing during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year

Study design

Country

Sample size included in analysis

GA of participants at time of sample collection (weeks)

Sample

Test and culture medium

Location of self-collection

GBS prevalence on self-collection

GBS prevalence on provider-collection

Funding sources

Arya 2008 [17]

Cross-sectional study

Ireland

600

35–37

Ano-vaginal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

9.80%

11.00%

Not documented

Camus 2021 [31]

Non-inferiority randomised cross-over trial

France

224

7–41

Vaginal swabs

Culture: direct plating only

Clinic

8.90%

8.00%

Material or financial support from company

Chen 2021 [32]

Cross-sectional study

China

520

35–40

Rectovaginal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

4.80%

3.45%

No conflicts of interest reported

Mercer 1995 [20] and Taylor 1997 [38]

Cross-sectional study

US

251

24- 42

Vaginal and rectal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

17.50%

13.50%

Not documented

Molnar 1997 [33]

Cross-sectional study

Canada

163

26–28

Vaginal-anorectal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

23.31%

19.63%

Not documented

Nebreda-Martin 2022 [34]

Cross-sectional study

Spain

189

35–37

Vaginal-rectal swab

Culture: direct plating only (71% of samples); enriched culture medium (29% of samples)

Home

13.61%

14.08%

No conflicts of interest reported

Price 2006 [19]

Randomised cross-over trial

Canada

330

35–37

Vaginal-rectal swab

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

17.00%

18.80%

No conflicts of interest reported

Salvesen 1999 [35]

Cross-sectional study

Norway

80

 > 37

Vaginal-anorectal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

33.00%

21.00%

Not documented

Seto 2019 [36]

Randomised cross-over trial

Hong Kong

422

35–37

Vaginal and rectal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

12.10%

19.20%

Not documented

Spieker 1999 [37]

Non-randomised cross-over study

US

240

28

Rectovaginal swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

7.90%

8.30%

Not documented

Torok 2000 [39]

Randomised cross-over trial

US

250

35–37

Anogenital swabs

Culture: enriched culture medium

Clinic

14.00%

16.00%

Not documented