Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants assigned to San’yas intensive training, brief anti-bias training, or control

From: Randomized controlled trial demonstrates novel tools to assess patient outcomes of Indigenous cultural safety training

 

San’yas intensive training

N = 20

Brief anti-bias training

N = 18

Control

N = 20

Age: Mean (SD)

44 (14)

38 (11)

42 (13)

Gender: (N (%))

 Male

6 (30%)

5 (27.8%)

5 (25%)

 Female

14 (70%)

13 (72.2%)

15 (75%)

Racial/ethnic group

 Non-White

4 (20%)

7 (39%)

9 (45%)

 White

16 (80%)

11 (61%)

11 (55%)

Professional designation:

 Staff

9 (45%)

9 (50%)

14 (70%)

 Resident

10 (50%)

8 (44.4%)

6 (30%)

 NP

1 (5%)

1 (5.6%)

0 (0%)

Professional practice

 Residents

10 (50%)

8 (44.4%)

6 (30%)

 < 5 years

2 (10%)

1 (5.6%)

4 (20%)

 5 to 10 years

1 (5%)

5 (27.8%)

1 (5%)

 10 + years

7 (35%)

4 (22.2%)

9 (45%)

Department

 Emergency

3 (15%)

2 (11.1%)

2 (10%)

 Academic FHT

15 (75%)

15 (83.3%)

17 (85%)

 North York Community practice

2 (10%)

1 (5.6%)

1 (5%)

 Previous Indigenous experiencea

2.6 (1.0)

2.6 (1.3)

2.9 (1.4)

Participated in other cultural safety trainingb

 No

17 (85%)

15 (83.3%)

20 (100%)

 Yes

3 (15%)

3 (16.7%)

0

Participated in other anti-oppression training

 No

17 (85%)

12 (66.7%)

18 (90%)

 Yes

3 (15%)

6 (33.3%)

2 (10%)

  1. FHT Family Health Team, NP nurse practitioner
  2. aLikert scale out of 7
  3. bOther training programs included non-evidence-based medical school content, seminars, and passive online training