Skip to main content

Table 3 Crude and adjusted analyses comparing the San’yas intensive training, brief training regimen, and control groups. Adjusted analyses control for health care provider age, gender, and previous Indigenous experience

From: Randomized controlled trial demonstrates novel tools to assess patient outcomes of Indigenous cultural safety training

 

San’yas intensive training

Brief anti-bias training

Overall patient experience

 Crude

0.30

(-0.087, 0.68)

0.35

(-0.075, 0.78)

 Adjusted

0.46

(0.12, 0.80)

0.40

(0.02, 0.78)

Highly recommend

 Crude OR

3.93

(0.88, 17.56)

3.30

(0.64, 17.16)

 Adjusted OR

6.88

(1.17, 40.45)

7.78

(1.05, 58.03)

NSAID renewal

 Crude

-1.02

(-2.52, 0.48)

0.94

(-0.72, 2.60)

 Adjusted

-0.82

(-2.36, 0.72)

0.61

(-1.13, 2.34)

Pain management

 Crude

0.87

(-0.66, 2.40)

1.39

(-0.30, 3.08)

 Adjusted

1.26

(-0.24, 2.75)

1.54

(-0.15, 3.23)

  1. All analyses are relative to the control group as the reference and 95% confidence limits are presented in parentheses
  2. Logistic regression and odds ratios are used for analysis of highly recommended; all other models are regression-based