Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: The influence of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on cognitive function in individuals without dementia: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Study (year)

Country

Group

Age

Mean (SD)

Female

(%)

N

Duration

(month)

n-3 PUFA

(mg/day)

Cognitive measures used

Corresponding domain

Notes

Summary RoB

Andrieu (2017) [53]

France

DHA, EPA

75.6 (4.7)

64

320

36

1025

MMSE, FCSRT, CNT, DSST, TMT-A

GLO, MEM, EF, PS, ATT

 

Low

Placebo

75.1 (4.3)

66

325

Arellanes (2020) [36]

USA

DHA

68.5 (58,90)*

89

15

6

2152

MoCA, CVLT, TMT-B, TMT-A

GLO, MEM, EF, ATT

CN at baseline

Unclear

Placebo

69 (58,79)*

73

14

Bischoff-Ferrari (2020) [54]

Europe

DHA, EPA

74.7 (4.3)

62.3

1073

12, 24, 36

990

MoCA

GLO

 

Low

Placebo

75.2 (4.6)

61.2

1084

Bo (2017) [45]

China

DHA, EPA

71.8 (5.68)

40.9

44

6

1200

BCAT, RM, MAE, PCT, SIE

GLO, MEM, EF, PS, VSF

MCI at baseline

Unclear

Placebo

70.5 (6.82)

40.5

42

Chew (2015) [51]

USA

DHA, EPA

72.7 (7.7)

58.8

1226

12

1000

TICS

GLO

 

Low

Placebo

72.7 (7.8)

56.2

1235

Dadova (2022) [55]

Czech Republic

DHA, EPA

70.8 (3.6)

100

27

4

230

POBAV

MEM

Only women

Unclear

Placebo

71.2 (4.0)

100

25

Dangour (2010) [52]

UK

DHA, EPA

74.7 (2.5)

46.6

376

24

700

GCF, CVLT, VF, SLM, DSF

GLO, MEM, EF, PS, ATT

 

Low

Placebo

74.6 (2.7)

43.4

372

Geleijnse (2012) [56]

Netherlands

DHA, EPA

69.2 (5.4)

33

627

10

400

MMSE

GLO

 

Low

Placebo

68.9 (5.4)

20

638

Hashimoto (2016) [49]

Japan

DHA

87.6 (3.3)

88.4

39

6, 12

1720

MMSE

GLO

 

Unclear

Placebo

89.6 (5.1)

84.4

27

Hashimoto (2021) [37]

Japan

ALA

71 (65, 83)*

54.8

35

12

4000

FAB

EF

CN at baseline

High

Placebo

71 (64, 84)*

51.5

24

Howe (2018) [57]

Australia

DHA, EPA

63.2 (1.6)

31.6

19

5

2000

Corresponding Z scores (See Table S2)

GLO, EF, PS

Borderline hypertensive adults

Low

Placebo

64.1 (2.3)

31.6

19

Ichinose (2021) [38]

Japan

DHA, EPA

69.1 (5.3)

53.8

26

12

434 (297, 137)

MMSE

GLO

CN at baseline

Low

Placebo

69.1 (4.9)

55.6

27

Kuszewski (2020) [58]

Australia

DHA, EPA

65.8 (1.4)

53

26

4

2400

RAVLT, Cognitive flexibility

MEM, EF

 

Low

Placebo

65.8 (1.4)

56

26

Lee (2013) [46]

Malaysia

DHA, EPA

66.4 (5.1)

82.4

17

6, 12

1750

Corresponding Z scores (see Table S2)

MEM, EF, PS, VSF

MCI at baseline

Low

Placebo

63.5 (3.0)

72.2

18

Macpherson (2022) [59]

Australia

DHA, EPA

70.0 (6.3)

70

69

6

1500

MoCA, TMT-B, CPF-z, TMT-A

GLO, EF, PS, ATT

Intervened only 6 months. Next 6 months was without n-3 PUFA

Low

Placebo

70.5 (5.9)

70

72

Mengelberg (2022) [47]

New Zealand

DHA, EPA

72.3 (6.2)

53

30

12

1842

RTot, RDM, TMT-B, DSF, RVC

GLO, MEM, EF, ATT, VSF

 

Low

Placebo

734. (7.0)

63

30

Ogawa (2023) [39]

Japan

ALA

71.9 (3.7)

46.7

30

3

2200

MMSE, WMSR-VM, LF, WAIS-PSI, WMSR-AC, WAIS-PRI

GLO, MEM, EF, PS, ATT, VSF

 

Low

Placebo

72.1 (4.3)

53.3

30

Power (2022) [40]

Ireland

DHA, EPA

69.0 (4.4)

56.7

28

24

520

RTot, SWM, SRT,

GLO, EF, PS

CN at baseline

Low

Placebo

69.8 (3.7)

70.0

22

Sala-Vila (2020) [50]

USA

ALA

69.4 (3.8)

67.4

324

6

1206

RAVLT, SF, SDMT, TMT-A, block design

MEM, EF, PS, ATT, VSF

Constituents were determined by FoodData Central**

CN at baseline

High

Placebo

68.9 (3.5)

68.5

312

Sinn (2012) [48]

Australia

DHA

74.2 (7.0)

28

16

6

1950/1830

ILFC

EF

MCI at baseline

Unclear

EPA

74.9 (5.1)

18

13

Placebo

73.0 (4.0)

53

15

Tokuda (2020) [42]

Japan

DHA, EPA

67.8 (0.8)

66.7

27

6

400

WMS-verbal delayed, VF, TMT-A

MEM, EF, ATT

CN at baseline

Low

Placebo

67.7 (1.1)

52.38

21

Valls-Pedret (2015) [43]

Spain

ALA

66.7 (5.3)

48.2

112

36

402.225

MMSE, RAVLT, VF, DSF

GLO, MEM, EF, ATT

Constituents were determined by FoodData Central**

CN at baseline

Unclear

Placebo

67.9 (5.4)

52.8

127

van de Rest (2008) [60]

Netherlands

DHA, EPA

69.9 (3.4)

45

96

3.25, 6.5

400, 1800

Corresponding Z scores (see Table S2)

MEM, EF, ATT

 

Low

Placebo

70.1 (3.7)

44

103

Yurko-Mauro (2010) [44]

USA

DHA

70 (9.3)

23.14

219

6

300

MMSE, VRM, SOC

GLO, MEM, EF

CN at baseline

Unclear

Placebo

70 (8.7)

24.69

218

  1. ATT attention, ALA alpha-linolenic acid, BCAT Basic Cognitive Aptitude Test, CN cognitively normal, CNT Category Naming Test, CPF-z Z score of Cogstate psychomotor function, CVLT California Verbal Learning Test, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, DSB Digit Span Backward, DSF Digit Span Forward, DSST Digit Symbol Substitution Test, EF executive function, EPA eicosapentaenoic acid, FAB frontal assessment battery, FCSRT Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, GLO global cognition, GCF Global Cognition Function, ILFC Initial Letter Fluency Change, LM lexical fluency, MAE Mental Arithmetic Efficiency, MCI mild cognitive impairment, MEM episodic memory, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, PCT Perceptual Speed, POBAV Pojmenování OBrázků A jejich Vybavení (Picture naming and their recall), PS Processing Speed, RAVLT Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RBANS Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, RDM delayed memory of RBANS, RM recognition memory, RVC visuospatial/constructional of RBANS, SDMT Symbol Digit Modalities Test, SF semantic fluency, SIE Space Imagery Efficiency, SLM Symbol Letter Modality, SOC Stockings of Cambridge, SRT simple reaction time, SWM spatial working memory, RTot total score of RBANS, TICS Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, TMT-A Trail Making Test-A, TMT-B Trail Making Test-B, VF verbal fluency, VRM Verbal Recognition Memory, WAIS-PRI Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-perceptual reasoning index, WAIS-PSI Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-processing speed index, WMS Wechsler memory scale, WMSR-AC Wechsler memory scale revised-attention/concentration, WMSR-VM Wechsler memory scale revised-verbal memory
  2. *median (min, max); **From U.S. Department of Agriculture (https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/)